Contract manufacturing automation for OEM teams

Request. Verify. Settle.From uploaded specs to accepted work in a 48-hour review window.

OEMs and factories lose weeks reconciling specs, QA exports, review threads, and payment terms after work is already complete. Fairbuild turns those handoffs into one funded, evidence-backed workflow: extract parameters, approve gates, verify factory evidence, and move accepted work through a 48-hour customer review window.

enterprise workflowOne settlement record
48-hour review window
  1. 01Source

    CSV, JSON, ERP, PLM, MES, or QA exports

  2. 02Extract

    AI drafts measurable parameters and confidence flags

  3. 03Gate

    Customer approves limits, grades, holdbacks, and payout terms

  4. 04Fund

    Approved partner rail boundary is confirmed before factory start

  5. 05Verify

    Factory evidence is checked against accepted gates

  6. 06Review

    Accepted work enters the 48-hour customer review window

  7. 07Settle

    Settlement instruction proceeds unless review is initiated

Source packagewlo_pvt_limits.csv124 parameters
Gate modelcritical, yield, grade, hold4 groups
Funding boundaryapproved partner railrequired
Review protocol48-hour customer windowopen
evidence to releasereview-aware settlement
Factory submitsbench log, recipe, calibration timestamp, unit trace
Fairbuild verifiesevidence against customer-approved limits
Customer choosesaccept, default path, or review protocol
Release ruleVerified work settles after the customer review window unless the customer initiates review.
OEM operating modelOne shared workflow for specs, factory evidence, review windows, and finance controls.
Factory confidenceContracts start only after funding is supplied, so capacity is tied to committed payment.
Verification pedigreeMeta, Samsung, Apple, LG Innotek, and Foxconn program experience from 20 years in optical metrology.

One workflow carries the agreement.

Each milestone has a source file, agreed limits, a funding boundary, factory evidence, and a defined review consequence.

SourceOne accepted contract modelSpecs, QA exports, limits, grade bands, and payout terms become a record both sides can inspect.
BoundaryFunding state before factory startProduction work begins only after the approved partner rail boundary is confirmed.
EvidenceFactory artifacts tied to gatesBench logs, recipes, calibration timestamps, and unit traces attach to the milestone.
Review48-hour customer windowAccepted work moves to settlement unless the customer initiates review, arbitration, or reinspection.

Three separate handoffs become one shared record.

Engineering defines what must be measured. The factory proves what was built. Finance needs to know when value can move. Fairbuild connects those truths before work starts.

Schematic showing OEM source files, factory proof, and finance controls converging into a Fairbuild accepted contract model with funding boundary, review rights, and settlement consequence
The unit of automation is not a payment. It is a verified manufacturing milestone with source data, evidence, review rights, and a settlement consequence.
Beyond binary pass/fail

Quality can grade the work, not just block it.

Manufacturing programs rarely reduce cleanly to one flag. Fairbuild lets teams define multiple gates and payment consequences: mandatory acceptance limits, yield tiers, A/B/C grades, engineering review triggers, bonus payments, holdbacks, and zero-payout closures.

The result is a contract both sides can inspect before work starts, with fewer emails after work finishes.

Quality gates and grading outcomes tied to payment consequences

Built for the teams that make production happen.

OEM operations and procurement

Standardize supplier execution before ambiguity becomes delay.

Clean spec handoffTurn messy spec exports into measurable acceptance tables that quality, finance, and the factory can share.
Less re-verificationEvidence, limits, provenance, and review timing are captured in one settlement record.
Finance controlsContracts cannot start until funding is supplied. Payment terms are visible before capacity is committed.

Factory operations and finance

Know what must be proven, how it will be judged, and when payment can release.

Committed fundingThe factory sees that the customer has funded the contract before the milestone begins.
Objective gradingQuality grades and payment consequences are agreed up front, not negotiated after delivery.
Bounded reviewVerified completion moves to settlement unless the customer initiates the review protocol.
Walkthrough to production

Let buyers test the workflow before real funds move.

Use a guided sandbox to load a sample manufacturing log, confirm AI-extracted parameters, define gates and grades, inspect review triggers, and preview the settlement instruction path before production money moves.

Try it free with sample dataSample contracts, sample states, no production custody
Go live with funded production milestonesCustomer funding required before contract initiation
Funding methodsPartner rail authorization for pilots. Bank or custody partner funding for production milestones.

Production fund custody should run through regulated payment, escrow, or custody partners.

Built by people who have lived the factory-floor problem.

Fairbuild is not a generic workflow wrapper. We have spent 20 years in optical metrology, MTF, SFR, ToF calibration, and production-line test systems for complex electronics programs. That experience tells us what verified evidence actually means.

The smart contract is the enforcement layer. The manufacturing judgment is what makes the gates worth enforcing.

Production-floor MTF and SFR test station
MTF / SFR station evidence feeds verification.
ToF calibration station
Per-unit artifacts become settlement evidence.

Evaluate Fairbuild for your next manufacturing milestone.

Bring a sample CSV or JSON file. We will show how the contract can extract parameters, define gates and grades, record the funding boundary, and preview settlement instructions.